Why do you assume that I am referring to you specifically? Sounds like you are the victim of “the hit dog howls”....again.
“Why do you assume that I am referring to you specifically?”
Well for one thing you acknowledged it in your reply to my post. If you weren’t referring to me you would have stated that instead of arguing that your ad hominem wasn’t really an ad hominem.
But it’s actually simpler than that. Your statement to x
“Who made the post should have been your first clue.”
refers back to my post 178. It’s the only post x was responding to.
In the future you might want to check your writing for logic traps before disavowing it. It works better than trying to come up with an excuse on the fly. Or you could simply man up and own your words, I’m not sure why you feel a need separate yourself from them.