[maxwellsmart_agent]

In an interracial union the people are not doing anything wrong.

[Plumberman27]

I agree. They are doing nothing wrong to themselves but in the future their choice may be recalled. I am not picking on any race or nationality. Lets say during WWII a young lily white Irish woman became impregnated with the son or daughter of a black military man from the US. The man dies in combat. The child is born and has all the typical Irish features. Fair skin red hair, freckles the whole nine yards. Time goes by and this child matures marries another typical Irish man and a baby is born with nappy hair, dark complexion, broad nose, and all the mixed characteristics of a mixed race child. Wonder what daddy will have to say now?

[srmorton]

In an interracial union the people are not doing anything wrong.

I agree. The comparison of homosexual marriage to interracial marriage is a specious argument. An interracial couple can procreate naturally and can play the traditional mother/father roles in the family, neither of which is possible in a homosexual union.

I do not "do" facebook, but one of my daughters told me that a friend from high school who now lives in London was on FB the day of the NC primary urging her friends to go and vote against Amendment 1. Yesterday, an eloquent letter appeared in our local newspaper expressing her disappointment in reading of the outcome of the vote. In it, she made the common mistake that those who are for homosexual marriage make - that this is all about the "right" of homosexuals to be married. Although they do have a right to love whom they chose to love, there is NO constitutional right to be married!