[Brown Deer]

Since something, judging by your words, is published then you're implying that it's available to the public.

LMAO, there you go again - misreading sentences.

What you quoted was:
...much of which has not been published here...

What part of the word "not" don't you understand?

I don't get it.

Obviously not.

Or are you using the wrong words to express your thoughts?

I believe that I understood the meaning of what was written. Why is so hard for you to understand?

[philman_36]

LMAO, there you go again - misreading sentences.
No, I'm not. Things were said and it's right there in black and white for all to see.
..."much of which", not "all of which"...
That means what it means and can only be read in one manner.
If the wrong words were used then an admission eliminates the curiosity such a statement raises.

What you quoted was: ...much of which has not been published here...
What part of the word "not" don't you understand?
I understand that "not" published here means it, potentially, was published elsewhere. Or else, again, the wrong words were used to convey what was meant.

Why don't you let the author of those words answer for themselves?

[philman_36]

@Of course there are truths amongst the lies...you just have to learn how to see beyond the lies.

It's just an "exercise" after all, isn't it?