To: laweeks
The slavery issue was a bit hypocritical, since the North didnt really have any cash crop that needed slaves. So their looking down their noses at the South was a but much. You raise a good point here. The North didn't need slaves because some of its labor-intensive industries -- like coal mining in Pennsylvania, for example -- had access to plenty of cheap labor who didn't cost anything to "buy" ... in the form of immigrants from Ireland and Wales.
49 posted on
08/30/2012 3:34:32 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
To: Alberta's Child
You raise a good point here. The North didn't need slaves because some of its labor-intensive industries -- like coal mining in Pennsylvania, for example -- had access to plenty of cheap labor who didn't cost anything to "buy" ... in the form of immigrants from Ireland and Wales.
And yet, poor as they were, they weren't too keen on picking cotton for no wages and getting whipped ...
60 posted on
08/30/2012 3:46:36 PM PDT by
x
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson