How about shooting cats. Where does that rank for you? Should I get $600,000 if an errant policeman wings my cat?
Here is a comment from the Washington Post>>>>
Interesting that the reporter did not choose to tell the whole story. The “boy” who the officers were trying to “locate” was wanted for robbery and burglary. In other words he was a fugitive. The parents knew where he was and all they had to do was point the way to the closet where he was hiding and the dog would be alive today.
But its the agenda of the Post to make law enforcement look bad and by reading these comments they have done their job.
On what evidence do you assert that I would consider a police officer shooting a cat less heinous than than the same officer shooting a dog?