First, I don't need to. YOU are making the affirmation that these are products of nuclear fusion. Therefore, the ENTIRE burden of proof is on you. Not me. I don't claim there is fusion.
Second, not a straw argument at all. It's the most likely source of the lack of reproducibility of these experiments and the artifacts seen: the heat is from ambient sources and the helium is already there. Just like in my basement.
First, I don’t need to.
***Yes you do. Because you chose to use the classic fallacy of straw argumentation, again and again, so you no longer have any credibility.
It’s the most likely source of the lack of reproducibility of these experiments and the artifacts seen: the heat is from ambient sources and the helium is already there.
***And those “most likely sources” of helium have been accounted for in these peer-reviewed papers. To use your ridiculous analogy, it would be as if your basement was filled with 100% helium. But you won’t be addressing this any time soon. How do I know this? Because of your pattern of arguing fallaciously. You seem utterly incapable of arguing without using classic fallacies. You should send your professor of the critical thinking class that you took that you have failed his class, again and again as evidenced on this thread.