Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Once you change the definition of marriage, you lose the right to say no one else can redefine it. So what form will it take next? Will I one day be able to marry my house plant and my TV for the government benefits? It’s no less legitimate than men marrying other men for the supposed big brother benefits.


3 posted on 04/26/2013 12:16:41 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Telepathic Intruder
It’s no less legitimate than men marrying other men for the supposed big brother benefits.

And lawyers. Can you imagine how many more divorces they will benefit from.

5 posted on 04/26/2013 12:22:55 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Telepathic Intruder
Once you change the definition of marriage, you lose the right to say no one else can redefine it. So what form will it take next? Will I one day be able to marry my house plant and my TV for the government benefits? It’s no less legitimate than men marrying other men for the supposed big brother benefits.

One equally valid and peaceful culture already has "marriages" for prostitution. I imagine we'll have marriages for gun transfers if private sales are regulated, for tax purposes (a New Year's Eve marriage for a day to transfer paper losses to someone with high taxable income), to avoid inheritance taxes (marry your father on his death bed), and similar trivial abuses of what used to be a sacred covenant.

19 posted on 04/26/2013 2:02:32 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson