Posted on 07/24/2013 1:11:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This is liberal tolerance in action. They "accept" the ignorance of us conservative yahoos.
Having grown up in Nashville, I never thought I would be reduced to tears out of sheer frustration after having a political conversation with a man raised in Philadelphia.
LOL. One of those enlightened Southerners who see everyone around them as ignorant, racist, inbred yahoos and dream of the Northern urban areas like New York and Philadelphia of being beacons of tolerance. I hate to burst this girl's bubble, but Frank Rizzo is from Philadephia. (So are a lot of us here on FR too.)
"About me:
Chloe Stillwell: Writer, witch, whiskey drinker."
Can’t she disagree with something Rush says without calling him sexually frustrated and diabetic?
This girl has major issues, in her view of the world, views of issues, and her view of those who are not as liberal as she is.
Her opiniont of her father in law is changed because she is so liberal, and she thinks conservative views are wrong? She won’t judge him on the content of his character, but on whether he watches Fox and listens to Rush? This is how she views the worthiness of people, by how liberal they are, or aren’t????? ..........................................
stunning........................................this
There is nothing more irritating about leftists than their penchant for pretending that ideological differences are actually differences in knowledge. They aren’t. And ironically, the author’s position on George Zimmerman demonstrates this. The facts don’t dictate the author’s position on the Zimmerman trial. Emotion does. The facts dictate precisely the opposite of the author’s position, and they support the jury’s verdict.
>> For me though, it was the first time I felt a unified notion of camaraderie with my fellow liberals, because even though its fiction, if this show has an audience then Im not alone.
Heh. Since Duck Dynasty has a considerably bigger audience, maybe you’re more alone than you think.
SnakeDoc
Typical liberal nitwit. One day she will wake up and realize that “Stepdad” was right. I really wish she would do that sooner than later because she is really making an ass out of herself.
Mrs. 2ndDivisionVet attended Archbishop Ryan High School.
a 17 year old burglar is a "child"
but
someone who is 17 weeks in the womb is most emphatically not a child.
This is the logic we're dealing with here.
Typical liberal. Says her stepdad is intelligent but no way in hell she’s going to listen to him.
Talks about facts. Then wants to convict Zimmerman on what’s right or wrong.
Walking contradictions.
Is a 17 year old Soldier, Airman, Marine or Sailor a child, I wonder? Because 17 year olds have been fighting and dying for this country since the beginning.
Actually, if "The Newsroom" has an audience, it's fictional.
Where’s the Barf Alert?
It’s posted in Smoky Backroom and the headline should’ve warned you.
:: One day she will wake up and realize that Stepdad was right. ::
and on that morning she will reflect on the evening past where a lad, having imbibed of intoxicants (maybe Sizzurp) forced her into a dark place and, holding a knife to her throat, forced her to commit oral sodomy to satisfy his perception of “untouchable power” over “whitey”.
Was this written by a high school freshman?
Larry: Well there wasnt enough evidence to determine if racial implications were involved.”
Me: Thats not even a real sentence.”
It’s slightly awkward, but it appears to be a real sentence.
Mad Men is about 2.5mm, so is Breaking Bad.
So in the lower range for "artsy" cable shows.
Compare this to basic cable's Rizzoli & Isles, for example, with about 5.5mm or NCIS with about 19mm.
You think that’s bad?
Jurors gave no credence to what led up to fight
As a man who has followed the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case from the killing through the entire trial, I am utterly incensed by the acquittal of Zimmerman. Hindsight is 20/20, but looking back at the six-female jury - five Caucasians, one Latina; five of them mothers; and none younger than in their 30s - the prosecution should have insisted on at least one African-American. Race ended up the trigger as feared.
While it’s clear that the prosecution’s presentation was miles away from being even close to a conviction for second-degree murder, surely the facts were there to warrant at least a manslaughter conviction. It’s evident that the jurors only considered the events at the actual confrontation between Martin and Zimmerman. They gave no credence to what led up to that fight. Martin, after getting snacks, was merely returning to his father’s condominium in the same complex which Zimmerman so proudly proclaimed himself neighborhood watchman.
Apparently in Florida it is now legal for a “wanna-be cop” (an apt prosecutorial description) to profile his “suspect” (repeatedly used in his police interrogations); give chase by following Martin in his truck until a confrontation occurs (evidenced by the taped conversation between Martin and horrendous prosecution witness Rachel Jeantel, where Martin screams to Zimmerman, “Get off me!”); here, the tape ends.
The brawl ensues and Zimmerman, regardless of the “Stand Your Ground” law, kills an unarmed African-American man. This is vigilante justice reminiscent of Wild West days. Trayvon Martin was on trial, not George Zimmerman.
Bobby Bourbeau
Kihei
Translated: I have renounced the Judeo-Christian ethic upon which this country was built, as well as the rule of law as codified by the US Constitution, and I grow angry when confronted with values I have rejected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.