Posted on 09/05/2017 1:09:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It Wasn’t Comey’s Decision to Exonerate Hillary – It Was Obama’s
National Review ^ | 09/02/2017 | Andrew C. McCarthy /FR Posted by For Your Children
The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that Jim Comey was out in front, but he was not calling the shots. On the right, the commentariat is in full-throttle outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April 2016 – more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now famous July 5 press conference.
The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrats’ nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed. It shows, they cry, that the fix was in! {..snip..} (Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
====================================
(HAT TIP WULI) Obama.....abetted by Comey & Lynch..... short-circuited a Hillary indictment, and because she was not indicted, she could not be pardoned by Obama (a move for which the Clintons probably paid Obama plenty). So completing the investigation means indicting her by the Trump DOJ--b/c she is not in double jeopardy.
It Wasn’t Comey’s Decision to Exonerate Hillary – It Was Obama’s
National Review ^ | 09/02/2017 | Andrew C. McCarthy /FR Posted by For Your Children
The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that Jim Comey was out in front, but he was not calling the shots. On the right, the commentariat is in full-throttle outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April 2016 – more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now famous July 5 press conference.
The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrats’ nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed. It shows, they cry, that the fix was in! {..snip..} (Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
====================================
(HAT TIP WULI) Obama.....abetted by Comey & Lynch..... short-circuited a Hillary indictment, and because she was not indicted, she could not be pardoned by Obama (a move for which the Clintons probably paid Obama plenty). So completing the investigation means indicting her by the Trump DOJ--b/c she is not in double jeopardy.
It Wasn’t Comey’s Decision to Exonerate Hillary – It Was Obama’s
National Review ^ | 09/02/2017 | Andrew C. McCarthy /FR Posted by For Your Children
The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that Jim Comey was out in front, but he was not calling the shots. On the right, the commentariat is in full-throttle outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April 2016 – more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now famous July 5 press conference.
The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrats’ nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed. It shows, they cry, that the fix was in! {..snip..} (Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
====================================
(HAT TIP WULI) Obama.....abetted by Comey & Lynch..... short-circuited a Hillary indictment, and because she was not indicted, she could not be pardoned by Obama (a move for which the Clintons probably paid Obama plenty). So completing the investigation means indicting her by the Trump DOJ--b/c she is not in double jeopardy.
As Slick Willy said it all depends on what the definition of “is” is
Hillaryous Rotten Criminal is 1/2 The Greatest Crime Couple in the history of this fabulous republic.
BEWARE of SERIAL SCUMBAGS, LIFELONG DECEIVERS.
Out of 350 millions some Americans, hillary’s goons only killed, what - 7 or 8 potential hostile witnesses.? That means she didn’t kill anybody. Not enough people to warrant a murder rap anyway. And if you include the entire population of Earth, the percentage of people she’s offed is truly minuscule. No crime here according to dirty comey and the deep state press.
“Hillary used an entirely different protocol for information she knew to be classified”
Did that ‘protocol’ involve allowing foreign enemies (who had contributed to the Clinton Fraud Foundation) to read the emails - by having access to a password?
Wow you must have superior control of your emotions because I would have burst out into laughter.
Blue Nation Review?
All I need to know.
Had to take several sips of coffee in order to keep up with the spits......
I found it in an article at Hot Air about Hillary promoting the author’s social media website to her fans.
And the 33,000 she admits to deleting?
I’m contending the server served “pay for secrets”: large ‘donations’ in exchange for easily hackable access to secrets.
When you write government emails using sensitive information, you must use the secure email your government employer uses. When you use ever more sensitive information in your email, you must follow the protocol for that information.
Creation of an email means you are the one who must “put the markings” on it. There is not someone to look at everyone’s email and put it there for you. Every government employee creates documents that must be properly marked and handled.
“Bore markings” IS the same as “marked”
..........
That depends on what the meaning of IS is.
Do we really care what was IN those emails instead of concentrating on the fact that she was mishandling government property (probably a lesser offense)? Put it in simple terms, she broke the law and needs to be held accountable. DO SOMETHING DAMMIT!
I smell BULLSH&T!
Why do leftists always need two or more authors to write their garbage? Just an observation...
What a load of BS.
And thank goodness for Judicial Watch.
They’ve done 100 times more successful hard work on getting to the truth than any committee in Congress has.
If Comey prepared his statement about Hillary being let off the hook before she was even interviewed, then the rest of this is all moot.
Trying to say Hillary didn't lie about her emails when Comey lied about the whole mess himself, then two lies don't make a positive, like this article wants us to believe.
Most of the nation, including most of her supporters, rated Hillary's top three personality traits during the campaign as "liar, dishonest and corrupt".
This article trying to claim otherwise, is bull pucky.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.