Posted on 07/27/2018 10:35:50 PM PDT by Rabin
Prior 03/22/2017, |by SeekAndFind
Mohammad Rauf, (aka Iyman Faris, a Pakistani) came to us from Bosnia in 1994, claiming asylum). By 2002 he had joined Osama bin Laden at an Al-Qaeda training camp, then returned to join up with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. In 2003, Rauf pled guilty to planning a second wave of attacks with al Qaeda. He’s due for release in 2020.
Justice Department (is) seeking to strip U.S. citizenship // Snipp //
July 11 2018, Judge Staci Yandle, an outstanding Obama appointee to the Illinois District Court, is having none of it. She has ruled, the government has not met the burden of proof. Yandle’s five-page citizenship, opinion, makes no mention of terrorist activities, Al-Qaeda, or the fact that he is still in a federal prison in Terra Haute, Ind.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
R.
I wonder if he can be deported under an ICE ruling (for illegal entry and fraud associated with it, possible passport fraud, his illegal marriage). These approaches would have nothing to do with his criminal conviction as a terrorist/supporter, thus leaving this foolish judge’s decision out of the equation.
Need to find the right “court” jurisdiction to handle this guy as an “illegal immigration” case.
When I was very young, I’d heard that any US citizen that went to fight with a foreign Army (like French Foreign Legion) could get in big trouble at home. Isn’t this a little worse than that??
After appealing that woman's decision, strip the treasonous so-called Judge Staci Yandle, of her position AND citizenship!
Then make sure that she is banned forever from any elected or appointed office.
Fighting in the French Foreign Legion was a totally different issue since it was an official arm of the France military.
ISIS, Al Qaeda etc are NOT official nation/governments. They are “terrorism movements” which have no standing in
international law.
Since Al Qaeda attacked the US (starting with the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane in NYC in the 1990’s, then the first Twin Towers Bombing (6 killed, over a 1,000 wounded or injured), and then 9/11, not to mention the twin embassy bombings in Kenya and possibly Tanzania (in the late 80s), anyone who joined AQ or aided them in any way was officially designated as a “terrorist” (i.e. enemy combatant) and should have been completely under US military control when captured (instead of Clinton’s fairy program of treating the events as “criminal actions”, which was what Holder/Obama also di.
If you want acts of treason, the AQ/ISIS US citizens or residents quality, and so does a military tribunal and firing squad. And that would include Democrat politicians and traitors.
Don't like the vague formulation of this title (too much wiggle room).
It should read: Any U.S. citizen convicted of terrorism should be stripped of his U.S. citizen (meaning that, in some cases - i.e., someone with no other citizenship - that person would then become stateless).
Timothy McVeigh, for example.
I imagine that U.S. citizens convicted of High Treason should likewise be stripped of their U.S. citizenship, right?
If, instead, the meaning is: Any naturalized citizen who lied during naturalization and, e.g., already had plans to commit treason / terrorism should be stripped of his U.S. citizenship - then that should be plainly stated.
Regards,
Much better statement of the correct answer. Any material lie during the immigration and naturalization process should result in a loss of citizenship and permanent deportation.
Before you know it, they’ll be registered to vote...
He’s right. No Convicted Terrorist should be a US Citizen; they all should be DEAD.
He’s right. No Convicted Terrorist should be a US Citizen; they all should be DEAD. Maggots gotta eat too.
Along with traitorous judges.
Especially them!
In isolation I agree. Combined with all the stupid things our government does, this is dangerous.
About 10 years ago there was a law proposed to label hacking as “terrorism”. Things I did occasionally with my employers permission literally fit this law’s definition of “terrorism”.
I can just imagine the fun a corrupt DOJ and FBI would have if a future candidate had done some penetration testing. Before Trump I would have said there’s no way the “anti-terrorism law” and “stripping of citizenship” would be abused. But now, if these laws passed and Mueller thought I had some dirt on Trump he would be able to take away my citizenship (or at least make a credible threat to do that).
I wouldn’t give our government the ability to take away citizenship if I saw a terrorist kill my family. I’d prefer death penalty, but at least lock him up for life.
ABSOLUTELY.
Enemies of the state should NOT be given that privilege.
+1; YES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.