Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic push to revive earmarks divides Republicans
Dissociated Press ^ | March 13, 2021 | Kevin Freking

Posted on 03/13/2021 11:20:31 AM PST by Olog-hai

Can lawmakers bring home the bacon without it being pork?

It’s a question that’s vexing Republicans as they consider whether to join a Democratic push to revive earmarks, the much-maligned practice where lawmakers direct federal spending to a specific project or institution back home. Examples include a new bridge, community library or university research program.

Earmarking was linked to corruption in the 2000s, leading to an outcry and their banishment in both the House and Senate. But many in Congress say the ban has gone too far, ceding the “power of the purse” to party leaders and the executive branch and giving lawmakers less incentive to work with members of the other party on major legislation. […]

Whether earmarking becomes bipartisan could have enormous implications not only for the allocation of spending across the country, but for President Joe Biden, who is gearing up for a massive infrastructure push that he hopes will attract significant Republican support. With earmarking in place, bipartisanship could prove easier to achieve, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle could have reason to support bills they would otherwise oppose. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: earmarks; kabukitheater; rinos; uniparty
“Bipartisan” = left-wing one-party rule. Don’t Freking tell me otherwise.
1 posted on 03/13/2021 11:20:31 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Earmarking was linked to corruption...”

Well, duh.


2 posted on 03/13/2021 11:28:44 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

a massive infrastructure push

**************

Because we’re not spending enough money. At the rate we’re going a $50 trillion debt is possible, if not likely.


3 posted on 03/13/2021 11:37:50 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Republicans as they consider whether to join a Democratic push to revive earmarks”

What would anyone not expect Congre$$ to support earmarks?


4 posted on 03/13/2021 11:51:09 AM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If the Dems want it then it’s bad.


5 posted on 03/13/2021 11:55:49 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Why stop at a trillion?


6 posted on 03/13/2021 12:24:52 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Trans Undocumented. Anti Woke Supremacist. Covid Abortionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Republicans who want war marks are sell outs

Get rid of them


7 posted on 03/13/2021 3:21:28 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Don’t worry RATS. The GOPEE will cave in at any moment. Little backstabbing to do first.


8 posted on 03/13/2021 4:00:27 PM PST by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson