Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islam’s Hatred of the Clitoris
FrontPage Magazine ^ | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 10/18/2001 9:48:56 PM PDT by VinnyTex

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-689 next last
To: VinnyTex
The silence of the feminazis toward this violence against females can mean one thing-- their allaince with the Islamic Nazis means more to them.
21 posted on 10/18/2001 10:11:13 PM PDT by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Actually, the feminists have been outspoken about this issue. They've attempted to win political asylum for girls from Africa who don't want to this done to them.
22 posted on 10/18/2001 10:12:36 PM PDT by Ed_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
You're divorced right? NO wonder! (jokeing)
23 posted on 10/18/2001 10:13:11 PM PDT by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Vigilanteman
The silence of the feminazis toward this violence against females can mean one thing-- their allaince with the Islamic Nazis means more to them.

Um, somehow I doubt that. Any feminist I know will talk my ear off if I mention female genital mutilation.

25 posted on 10/18/2001 10:14:02 PM PDT by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
They are not barbaric and evil, they are peacful loving individuals
26 posted on 10/18/2001 10:14:07 PM PDT by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seams2me
To remove the entire clitoris, hood, external and internal labia, would not be comparable to anything you could do to a man. except maybe for John Bobbitt.
27 posted on 10/18/2001 10:18:23 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Actually, the article doesn't exaggerate. One thing though, with this atrocity in existence, why do the feminazis focus on slaughtering the unborn, instead of going to war to stop this hideous mutilation of girls/women? If one is to rage against life, let it be against the bastards that mutilate young girls and women, not the innocent unborn around the world!
28 posted on 10/18/2001 10:20:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
There is a model from Africa - very famous - (can't remember her name) who was finally able to tell about what they did to her. Layed her out on a rock in the sun, nothing to kill the pain, tied her down, mutilated her, and left her genitals on the ground to shrivel in the sun while she was unconcious from the pain. Believe it. It's the absolute truth.
29 posted on 10/18/2001 10:21:28 PM PDT by CarolAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Boru
"It certainly is. Male circumcision is just as barbaric and stupid as female circumcision."

They are apples and oranges. Male circumcision removes foreskin. Female circumcision removes the whole organ or mutilates it to the point that it no longer functions. You can't even equate the two.

30 posted on 10/18/2001 10:21:38 PM PDT by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
These practices still take place here in America among people that come from these lands. Although the practice may not be as frequent here it is none the less still practiced.
31 posted on 10/18/2001 10:22:28 PM PDT by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolAnn
Good point. Male circumcision is based on health. Uncut dudes get diseases. The Jews had it right with pork (ringworm) too.
32 posted on 10/18/2001 10:22:41 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
"I'm having a tough time believing this. I can't believe that any man or woman would do this or allow it to be done if it's done as described."

I've seen it described, etc on some of the learning channels. It happens.

33 posted on 10/18/2001 10:23:13 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Intersting that Oprah had a couple shows on ealier in the year about this and how horrible it is ...CUT TO....her show on Islam. Hmmmmmm..... Where are all these NOW Women?
34 posted on 10/18/2001 10:23:32 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WolfsView
What is the description of the afterlife promised to devout female Muslims (fidels?)?
35 posted on 10/18/2001 10:24:36 PM PDT by yianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
You can't even equate the two.

I'll agree that the two are very different, but it still doesn't get rid of the fact that we're subjecting male babies in the U.S. of A. to undergo penile surgery literally hours or days after their birth FOR NO GOOD REASON.

"Oh, they can't feel it. Oh, it's a cleanliness issue."

What I find the most odd about it is the implication that GOD somehow screwed up when designing the male penis. Everything else on the body seems to have been 'created' just fine, but those penises... God must have screwed up, so we gotta run in there with knives to cut away at male baby penises. It's twisted.

BTW, I'm not religious in the least, but I'll firmly say that I think the male penis has 'evolved' or was 'created' just fine, thank you very much.

36 posted on 10/18/2001 10:27:20 PM PDT by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Attention all feminazis! So, you think we rednecks are bad. Shee-it, all we want is to give you a slap on the bottom and for you to bring us a cold one. And you thought you had it so rough.
37 posted on 10/18/2001 10:27:22 PM PDT by Hemlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yianni
"What is the description of the afterlife promised to devout female Muslims (fidels?)?"

Maybe 72 studs and silk sheets!

Actually, I hope where those hijackers went, they get their 72 virgins - and they all look like Helen Thomas.

38 posted on 10/18/2001 10:28:09 PM PDT by CarolAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Boru
On the contrary, the primary purpose of circumcision is increased cleanliness and penile health.

Removing the foreskin allows the head of the penis to be cleaned much easier, thereby reducing the risk of bladder infections in infants and toddlers, and the potential for causing uterine infections in wives later on in life. It eliminates the potential for foreskin fusion to the penis, which can prevent the head of the penis from emerging beyond the foreskin during an erection. Further, it reduces the risk of penile cancer.

Circumcision is no longer SOP in hospitals. Parents are asked whether they want the procedure or not. FTR, my husband and I chose not have our son circumcised. We left him exactly as God made him.

39 posted on 10/18/2001 10:29:24 PM PDT by TheWriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CarolAnn
Uuuuummmm - there's a huge difference. Male circumcision doesn't prevent him from having sexual pleasure.

Thank you for your expertise on the male penis, MISS CarolAnn. ;)

40 posted on 10/18/2001 10:30:18 PM PDT by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson