[demsux]

I just posted the following on the other thread, any ideas?

Posted by demsux to ~Kim4VRWC's~
On General Interest Sep 6 5:50 PM #233 of 234

A question just entered my mind,
Why was it so "important" that Danielle was taken from her room by a stranger.

IMO, the case against DW would have been much more believable under the scenario that Danielle "sleepwalked" out of the house and DW saw her, grabbed her and took her.

If that had been the explanation, even I would have bought it...but there is no way I'm buying that a drunken stranger staggered past the dog, up the stairs, grabbed the girl, went down the stairs, past the dog again and took her away.

Why was the house entry central to the prosecution's case? Anyone have an idea?

Leaving for the evening, will check later

[John Jamieson]

I agree that there is so much here that is unexplained.

How can everyone ignore 4 bugsperts that say that DW couldn't have dumped the body.

Even if DW was involved, the story has never made sense. Others have to be involved.

It's very likely that Danielle's killer(s) is (are) getting away.

This whole mess makes much more sense if the known child porno ring in SD is involved.