Skip to comments.
HAITIANS AND THE FREE STATE PROJECT
SierraTimes.com ^
| Nov. 1, 2002
| J.J. Johnson
Posted on 11/02/2002 9:11:20 AM PST by madfly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Last time I checked, we were at war. Part of that war means protection of our borders, among the most glaring issues this political season that few, if any, politicians on either side want to touch.
1
posted on
11/02/2002 9:11:20 AM PST
by
madfly
To: Tonyklo; ppaul; FreePaul; OldFriend; Texas_Jarhead; blam; ClaireSolt; litehaus; isthisnickcool; ...
Sierra Times ping
2
posted on
11/02/2002 9:23:30 AM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
2. If the vessel continues to approach, have one missile (fired by either ship or air) detonate about 50 yards in front of said vessel with the words "last warning" to follow.3. If vessel persists, aim for the midsection of said vessel with similar missile, document results.
I mentioned this at work this week when we were discussing the illegal alien Haitians and what we should do to protect our borders. My suggestion didn't involve a missile, though. I suggested that the Coast Guard (or Navy) fire their 3-inch deck gun or deck mounted .50 cal. machine gun across the bow of the vessel. If this does not deter the captain of the vessel from entering our waters, use the deck gun or machine gun to rip a hole in the hull of their ship and sink it. Film the sinking of the ship and televise it and let it serve as a warning to others who may attempt such foolishness that we mean business and we WILL protect our borders. Everyone at the office agreed with me. No one disagreed. I doubt, however, that those in charge have the b@lls to do this. They would be too worried about what the rest of the world thinks. F--k the rest of the world, is what I say. Secure our borders now.
To: Free the USA; Tancredo Fan; Marine Inspector; Ajnin; agitator; Sabertooth; Tancred; Spiff; ...
Sierra Times ping
4
posted on
11/02/2002 9:29:16 AM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
The only thing to add is to remind everyone that it was Clinton who installed the present Marxist oriented regime in Haiti. To do so, he had to threaten the Marine invasion--which did in fact occur--to oust a West Point Graduate, who had values similar to those of mainstream Americans. That was one of the reasons Clinton should have been impeached, but the gutless wonders in Washington preferred to go after him for far less serious offenses.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
5
posted on
11/02/2002 9:31:07 AM PST
by
Ohioan
To: madfly
The "Homeland Security" program is a pathetic joke.
6
posted on
11/02/2002 9:35:14 AM PST
by
sarcasm
To: Clinton Is Scum; norton; Under the Radar; Slip18; Teacher317; NorseWood; cynicom; WhiteGuy; ...
Sierra Times ping
7
posted on
11/02/2002 9:35:30 AM PST
by
madfly
To: USA21; isee; KingKongCobra; wonders; home educate; Mad_Tom_Rackham; 3AngelaD; LaGrone; ...
Sierra Times ping
8
posted on
11/02/2002 9:37:44 AM PST
by
madfly
To: american_ranger; engrpat; LADY J; Ahban; shiva; Nebr FAL owner; winodog; anniegetyourgun
ping
9
posted on
11/02/2002 9:39:21 AM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
Bttt!
To: RAT_Poison
Secure our borders now.What you propose no doubt is harsh. However, we may very well see such a policy put in place. George W. and his advisors have their plate pretty full right now, as you know. However, after this election I believe we'll see the illegal immigration (invasion) issue dealt with.
I predict a bunch of illegals already here will be deported and entry made much tougher. Just my opinion.
11
posted on
11/02/2002 9:46:11 AM PST
by
toddst
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: madfly
Just one thing: an awful lot of Americans died the last time someone started a "free state" project , because it ended up with a war between the states...with the "free staters" on the losing end.
To: toddst
However, after this election I believe we'll see the illegal immigration (invasion) issue dealt with. Hopefully the way it's dealt with, if it is does not include any form of amnesty. If we keep rewarding these lawbreakers, they're going to keep coming.
To: toddst
What in the world makes you believe that???
Everything Bush has said and done leads me to believe just the opposite.
15
posted on
11/02/2002 10:01:42 AM PST
by
4Freedom
To: toddst
Secure our borders now
I think you need a reality check.
I do not see any thing being done, the reason why,
Democrats are on the band wagon with ammensty
Republicans want ammensty
President Bush is for ammensty
The INS is still the same, left hand does not know what the right hand is doing, doing their own thing, not following the law.
I have an idea there are good people trying their best to do the right thing, but the powers that head the INS, does not want any thing done, President Bush,
Asscroft, just to name two that are ignoring the illegal problem, who by the way, give the orders
To: calawah98
bttt
17
posted on
11/02/2002 10:23:57 AM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
Terrorism, immigration and taxes are the only three things on my radar screen right now. I will start voting for those (in any party) who address these issues. (All three of these issues are connected!)
18
posted on
11/02/2002 10:24:28 AM PST
by
blam
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: toddst
What you propose no doubt is harsh. However, we may very well see such a policy put in place. George W. and his advisors have their plate pretty full right now, as you know. However, after this election I believe we'll see the illegal immigration (invasion) issue dealt with. I commend you for your optimism (hope you are right) but I doubt this will happen. My take on Bush is that he is FOR illegal immigration and thus will NEVER direct the necessary resources to stop the mass invasion of our southern borders or instruct the INS to enforce our nation's immigration laws.
In fact I predict that Bush will unload the 245(i) Amnesty for Illegal Aliens on America shortly after the election. Everything I've seen and heard out of this administration indicates that this is the likely case. In my opinion, the restoration of America's sovereignty will require another president that puts the interests of the American People and America ahead of foreign interests.
20
posted on
11/02/2002 10:31:05 AM PST
by
WRhine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson