In fact that would be all right with me. But there's no real need seeing as how there are very few overzealous idiotic people who go around saying stuff like "General Relativity is a FACT", as is commonly said about "evolution".
In fact, everything in science should be labeled a theory, since it is always open to review and alteration because of new evidence.
Exactly. But evolution proponents often seem to forget this. Best,
In fact, everything in science should be labeled a theory, since it is always open to review and alteration because of new evidence.
This is one of the arguments that is always being used by evolutionists. While technically true, most of these have been proven through controlled repeatable experiments, which is the heart of the scientific method, and therefore they have a degree of certainty that cannot be claimed for evolution. The ones which do not have experimental proofs often are stated as being just theories, and no one has a problem with that. So the situation is kind of the opposite of what you're saying, i.e. evolution has to have a special status and be stated as a proven fact when it's not.