Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: The Grammarian
You realize that one of the definitions for a "myth" is a story that is unverifiable, correct? Explain to me how one can reproduce evolution, empirically, such that it is fact, again?

We can't kill Nicole Simpson all over again. But we can look at the clues and figure out that OJ did it. That's how it is with any historical science. Life on Earth developed over time, and all species are related. Those are facts.

61 posted on 12/11/2002 12:23:03 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Prove it. Empirically.
70 posted on 12/11/2002 1:09:44 PM PST by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Those are facts."

No. those are what YOU think are facts. They can not be empirically reproduced scientifically, so SCIENTICALLY, it is thus only a THEORY. Unless you can scientifically, empirically reproduce what you conjecture, then it's NOT FACT, IT'S THEORY. That's why it's called the "Theory of Evolution", not the "Fact of Evolution".

1,552 posted on 12/30/2002 6:58:14 PM PST by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson