Really? Care to give the post numbers? Bet you do not. Naturalism is another word for materialism, part of the semantic games played by those who like to confuse the issues. Your lack of willingness to explain how your views differ from those of materialism shows only that you wish to give yourself room to dance around the issues.
Really? Care to give the post numbers? Bet you do not. Naturalism is another word for materialism, part of the semantic games played by those who like to confuse the issues. Your lack of willingness to explain how your views differ from those of materialism shows only that you wish to give yourself room to dance around the issues.
You can follow an entire thread of this discussion, going back through #6161, #6129, and #6041. I just checked, and can report that my 10 year old niece can grasp the difference between believing God doesn't exist (materialism), and believing God's existence is irrelevant to the question at hand (strict naturalism), given this much information on the subject, this many times.
Perhaps the difference is, that she isn't paying just barely enough attention to enable her to repost yet again her own personal bizzaro take on what science presently believes, yet again.
Since I failed to detect it in your responses, could you return the courtesy and repost the cites of microbiological journal articles that support your claim that science has proven that life could not have arisen from natural causes?