Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Dang HLL - we can always count on you to defend sanity when this arguement pops up. You are the only person I know who has a better eye for female beauty than I do. I'll just have to work harder to keep up.
328 posted on 12/20/2002 6:59:36 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Hegewisch Dupa
Thank you very much for the compliment. I see nothing wrong with beautiful women or wanting to be beautiful. I know that I don't get ready in the morning to look ugly. Just becuase I don't own a pair of Birkenstocks or go around as a plain Jane doesn't make me less respectable.

I also refuse to starve myself to death or put big bags of chemicals in my chest to try to be attractive to men. I am happy just the way I am.
341 posted on 12/20/2002 7:19:14 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

To: Hegewisch Dupa; Long Cut; Fintan; habs4ever
There is something glaring that stands out about that glamour gals of yesteryear and the current ones.

Loren, Gardner, Kelly, Hepburn, Russell, and the others had CLASS. They were feminine, they were ladies, and they didn't need to get naked and be trashy to be considered desirable. Class. What a concept.
378 posted on 12/20/2002 11:24:02 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson