How is that? All the history of cannabis classification and legislation I have looked up only refer to a couple of special interests that were involved in the initial legislation. There seems to have been no "society" input. 
Posted on 02/21/2003 8:04:16 AM PST by MrLeRoy
Medical marijuana users and growers in California could cite state law as a defense against federal prosecutors who criminalize their actions, under a bill planned by three federal lawmakers.
U.S. Reps. Sam Farr, D-Carmel, and Lynne Woolsey, D-Petaluma, plan to co-sponsor the bill next month with Rep. Dana Rohrbacher, an Orange County Republican.
The proposed legislation comes in the wake of stepped-up federal raids on medical marijuana gardens over the past year, including one at a Santa Cruz County cooperative last September.
The legislation also comes after marijuana guru Ed Rosenthal was convicted on federal charges of growing pot in Oakland in a trial during which his lawyers weren’t allowed to mention he was growing it for Oakland’s medical marijuana patients.
"The purpose of this bill is to allow defendants in federal criminal trials to introduce evidence that their marijuana-related activity was performed for a valid medical purpose under state law," Farr said in a written statement.
Farr is to be honored today in Sacramento during a press conference hosted by the marijuana advocacy group Americans for Safe Access. He was to be joined by family members of people recently convicted on federal marijuana charges.
Eight states have approved medical marijuana use, but the bill recognizing state marijuana law is likely to face an uphill battle in a Republican-controlled Congress.
Rohrbacher said the bill was a reasonable approach to settling the conflict between federal and state laws.
"As far as I know, it is the people of the state who are supposed to be determining criminal laws," he said by telephone Wednesday. "I just think that if the majority of people in a state vote to permit people to use marijuana for medical purposes, the federal government should not interfere with that."
The tension between federal enforcement and state laws was highlighted in Santa Cruz County during last September’s raid of the Wo/Men’s Alliance for Medical Marijuana’s Davenport garden.
About 167 plants were uprooted by federal drug agents, and co-founders Mike and Valerie Corral were briefly jailed. No charges have been filed.
Ben Rice, an attorney for the cooperative, said that while he wasn’t optimistic a federal measure would pass, he welcomed the proposed legislation.
"The WAMM and Rosenthal cases have really galvanized national attention to the problem we have here," Rice said. "I think this is a terrific move."
While the DEA hasn’t filed charges, WAMM has gone on the offensive, filing suit against the feds.
Having lost the first round of a court battle to get the marijuana back, the group is appealing the decision.
The group also plans to seek an injunction prohibiting similar raids in the future. The county and city have voted to join that suit as plaintiffs.
If you think medical pot is such a "sham", try and get a doctors authorization then report back here with your results.
Doctors don't take this issue lightly.
How is that? All the history of cannabis classification and legislation I have looked up only refer to a couple of special interests that were involved in the initial legislation. There seems to have been no "society" input.
Right. Just like over sixty people died in the night club fire last night. Just doing their thing. Many chanting "Wow, that is great" as the building burned around them, unaware that they were facing death. A scene of the future under libertarian social rules.
George Soros, etal: "Medical marijuana" is being pursued in order to normalize society to the use of ALL drugs. Right now there is almost no support for the legalization of hard drugs therefor we must use a strategy of "incrementalization". The first step is to gain public sympathy for "medical marijuana". Their goal is a society where ALL drugs are readily available. If you look at the LP plank, they purposely OMIT any mention of "adults" in their desire to eliminate ALL drug laws.
These guys don't like their cage kicked. Nor do they want to answer sensitive questions about how such drugs as ecstasy would be used in a society where it would be legal to get it served in the local pizza house down the corner or at the mini-mart across the street from the high school.
Uh, that's disingenous.
The moderator requested that flames be taken to the back room.
Sorta thinned skinned to try to send every sarcastic remark off the thread, no?
And maybe you might want to try this (I have no connection to it, I just thought it might help calm your drug-free nerves):
I guess you mean that No government would be best.
Ask William T. He said it, not me.
Just a strategy they use to divert the issues. They have been warned by the moderators more than once. Their reputation is growing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.