>>> The person ( info_scout ), who employed this word, referring to the FIRST SEVEN DAYS of this war, doesn't know the meaning of this word.<<<
>>>If ONLY people would NOT talk about things they know little to NOTHING about, FR wouldn't have to spend so much money on wasted bandwidtdh. :-) <<<
Again, your reply resorts to the personal. If your convictions are secure, why attack an individual expressing another opinion? And I assure you my opinions are entirely my own, although as all of us are influenced by the information we have available (or are willing to consider).
Are you sure that people should not express opinions just because you do not agree? If they do not agree with an opinion does that mean the individual does not know what they are talking about, and are unworthy of 'bandwidth'? Perhaps I am mistaken, but I thought that was the whole point of maintaining a forum for the exchange of ideas among conservatives.
Again with the J'Accuse of " personal attacks " ? What's with you ? You've been on FR long enough, to know the difference between a " personal attack " and fact/opinion.
You've also been on FR long enough to know, or you should, that anyone, who is completely incapable of proving the verasity of his or her opinion, is in deep trouble. You haven't proved a thing ; other than the FACT that YOU don't know anything, whatsoever, about war, battles, strategy, and what's going on . This IS considered to be a WASTE OF BANDWIDTH around here. It's also inane, banal, and patently ridiculous to add NOTHING, whatsoever, to a discussion, and then whinge about having the same rights as everyone to state an opinion.
WHOM DID YOU VOTE FOR, IN THE 2000 ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT AND WILL YOU VOTE , IN 2004, FOR PRESIDENT BUSH ?