Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Yes, I'm in favor of ending the war on drugs at the federal level. It's just another criminal matter best left to the state and local authorities (with the possible exception of smuggling and interstate racketeering, etc.m which would still be federal matters).

But, no, I agree with and support the war on terror. This is in defense of the nation which is federal responsibility number one. International terrorists attacked and threatened us. We have every right to go after them in self-defense. And our Congress voted overwhelmingly to authorize our Commander-in-chief to do whatever it takes and to go wherever he needed to go to take them out. Too bad some people now have cold feet, but I'm certain that we are going to continue on and see this through. I think the people and the Congress are still with him on this.



428 posted on 05/03/2003 12:44:13 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson; John Robinson; Lazamataz; RnMomof7; the_doc; Jerry_M; CCWoody
Yes, I'm in favor of ending the war on drugs at the federal level. It's just another criminal matter best left to the state and local authorities (with the possible exception of smuggling and interstate racketeering, etc.m which would still be federal matters).

As such, you should probably ignore most of my #432 (I hadn't seen your #428 at the time of composition).

But at least, if it ain't a Federal Case, you can always move to another State, be productive, and make a new life for yourself. It ain't perfect, but at least it's Federalism. I can agree with that.

I still have some disagreements with George W. Bush.

It's easy to forget, Federal Spending actually kills real human beings. But you're self-employed yourself, and so is my own Mother -- so you know this. The Dollar that the Federal Government takes away today is the very same Dollar that the home-schooling father would have spent on his daughter's asthma medicine tomorrow.

Since 1965, the Federal Government has wasted over $6 Trillion Dollars on "Anti-Poverty Programs" -- enough to CUT EVERY POOR PERSON IN AMERICA (Man, Woman, Child, and Infant) A CHECK for $150,000 Dollars and simply say, "Here's $150 Grand of Other People's Money! You're NO LONGER POOR!!"

(Don't even get me started on adjusting that sum for inflation; I'd have to buy you a beer, so as we could both cry in our mugs)

9-11 is a Rare Case. It is an extremely rare case when the Federal Government acts in the Best Interest of its People.

Generally speaking, the Federal Government is not the Friend of the Citizenry. Generally speaking, the Federal Government is the implacable enemy of the Citizenry.

Under Bush, under Clinton, under the whole bloody lot.

As Deficits grow (and newborn children inherit $100,000 of Debt on their first birthday)... never forget.

435 posted on 05/03/2003 1:36:07 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
As such, you should probably ignore most of my #432 ~~ OP, post #435

Hmm... never mind, the Moderator blitzed it anyway.

No harm done, I just think it's kinda funny.

437 posted on 05/03/2003 1:39:15 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson