Skip to comments.
Marijuana makes you go crazy
Ananova ^
| July 2 2003
Posted on 07/02/2003 2:31:32 PM PDT by rastus macgill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Breaking News dope makes you go crazy Reefer Madness was right!
To: rastus macgill
Professor Murray said these findings had been largely ignored.That's because it is unscientific, post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning.
2
posted on
07/02/2003 2:34:40 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: rastus macgill
Third post and it's already in the backroom.
(sarcasm)Good goin' kids.(/sarcasm)
3
posted on
07/02/2003 2:36:16 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: jammer
Hey are they moving all the WOD threads now? That was quick.
To: rastus macgill
Nope. But this has been posted before. You folks go ahead--I won't intefere any more by pointing out the obvious.
5
posted on
07/02/2003 2:39:00 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: jammer
a tile and keyword search didn't find it I saw it linked on Drudge searched FR did not see it.
To: rastus macgill
Yes, you are correct, and I was ...hmmm...infelicitous? Nope, just flat wrong. The report on the RESEARCH was a long, long thread a couple of months ago. When you get as old and broken-down and decrepit as I, you will forget time-lines too. No excuses.
7
posted on
07/02/2003 2:46:41 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: rastus macgill
According to the all the dopers and druggies, Reefer Madness was nothing but propaganda and marijuana is just a wild herb, given as a gift to mankind, by God!
Pot heads don't believe smoking marijuana will cause lung cancer, emphysema nor will it lead to heart attacks and strokes. Pot heads think smoking pot is healthy for a person. Pot heads think smoking marijuana is good for society and everyone should get stoned on pot. Pot heads say, it enhances a persons driving abilities.
Pot heads believe this lastest report is simply more propaganda by the mainstream establishment, to undermine their efforts to decriminalize and eventually legalize marijuana in the good old USA.
Pot heads say smoking marijuana doesn't cause psychotic symptoms or lead to severe mental problems. Just ask them. They'll tell ya!
To: jammer
Are the mods moving all WOD and/or pseudo-science posts now?
I hope not the latter as I like the pseudo-archaeology Blam dredges up.
To: rastus macgill
I forgot one thing.
Pot heads think they have a constitutional right to smoke marijuana. Just ask them. They'll tell ya, its their right to get stoned on marijuana. LOL
To: rastus macgill
Yeah, I agree. I hope not.
11
posted on
07/02/2003 3:12:27 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: Reagan Man
constitutional right to smoke marijuana. Okay, you have adequately represented the "pot heads" and "dope smokers" I think it was. But you have NOT adequately represented those of us who wouldn't dream of smoking a joint (or any other recreational drug, including alcohol), but who still know that the Constitution does not in any way grant rights to smoke marijuana or for a citizen to do anything else. The Constitution, in the Bill of Rights, makes explicit those natural rights we already have that the government cannot abridge and lists the rights that the GOVERNMENT may employ to maintain a civil society.
That may be too subtle, but is an important distinction that many of us make and wish weren't being eroded. Just pass the Amendment to ban marijuana and I'll go along with you. Until then, the Constitution is silent---therefore, it's none of my or your business at the federal level.
You probably won't tackle that and certainly can't tackle it with any intellectual rigor.
12
posted on
07/02/2003 3:20:29 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: jammer
In America today, it is illegal to cultivate, grow, sell, purchase and ingest marijuana. It doesn't take intellectual rigor to tackle this issue. Just some plain common sense, honesty and morality. Roughly 70% of American's oppose legalizing marijuana. The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 is the legislation that stipulates marijuana is a dangerous substance. The USSC decision in Touby v US, clearly gave legal backing to the CSA.
The fact you disagree with that legislation and the legal decision is of no consequence. And the USSC has the final say on what is and isn't constituional. Read Marbury v Madison and find out for yourself.
If you say you don't smoke marijuana, then you need to learn to pick your fights better. The fact you defend the right of people to smoke marijuana and thereby agree with its legalization, IMO speaks directly to the real issue. You do have a dog in this fight.
To: rastus macgill
any excuse will do in a storm. get real. lets
face it . we all are all little nuts but cannibis has nothing to do with it.
14
posted on
07/02/2003 5:06:42 PM PDT
by
Walnut
To: Reagan Man
Your absolutley right. As long as they do noT not, and I reiterate. do not drink alcohol at the same time
15
posted on
07/02/2003 5:08:55 PM PDT
by
Walnut
To: Reagan Man
Say it isn't so. please!!!, It can't be all that bad for you. OK ,If you inhale it may be bad but what if you are just in the same room? Is it ok if you hold your breath.?
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
16
posted on
07/02/2003 5:12:12 PM PDT
by
Walnut
To: Reagan Man
AND THE QUESTION iS?
17
posted on
07/02/2003 5:13:03 PM PDT
by
Walnut
To: jammer
i DON'T GET IT WHERE ARE YOU COMING FROM?
18
posted on
07/02/2003 5:20:56 PM PDT
by
Walnut
To: rastus macgill
I always thought that talking to one's self, eating dog feces, and sleeping on a subway grate made one crazy - who knew?
To: Reagan Man
No, it's not. It must take some rigor, because you cannot seem to get the point. If 70% of people oppose, then give the government the right to outlaw it with an amendment.
Just because a USSC decision was made doesn't make it "Constitutional." I HAVE read Marbury vs Madison. They take it unto themselves, as might makes right, but that doesn't make Dred Scott, Roe v. Wade, or anything else Constitutional--only nominally Constitutional. And we can--and should--insist on courts following the Constitution.
And you are wrong--I have no dog in this fight except the Constitution. Don't ever reply to me again. Your assertion about my motives is wrong, dishonorable and reprehensible.
20
posted on
07/02/2003 6:29:57 PM PDT
by
jammer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson