To: jammer
>> the same as Texas shouldn't have to condone homosexual sodomy...
Probly gonna step in something here, but that's another one of those things I think is wrong and potentally harmful, but in and of itself, not a legitimate concern of government. I don't necessarily give a rip myself what the fags are doing to each other as long as it involves consenting adults harming nobody else, so a law that simply bans "sodomy" would be over the line in my book.
Not up on the case enough to know if the USSC decision is about anything else in particular, so my dog and I will be going home now.
Dave in Eugene
34 posted on
07/02/2003 8:59:36 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(The dyslexic agnostic insomniac kept awake pondering the existence of Dog.)
To: Dave in Eugene of all places
Actually, I think your post and, especially, your previous one to me are excellent explanations of what I tried to get across. Although, I think that Texans do have a right to make the law, even if I disagree with it. Thanks for your reasoned discussion.
35 posted on
07/02/2003 9:09:57 PM PDT by
jammer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson