[Catspaw]

No, I am not. Logic clearly is not your strong suit. Pointing out that violence WILL happen, that it is axiomatic that the pathological violence of "legal" abortion, is NOT the same as advocating violence

Of course you're advocating violence. In fact, you'd probably have that same grin on your face the next time an abortion doc is shot that Hill had, out of joy.

[Polycarp]

Of course, you wish I had said this, because then you could disregard the cold hard facts I am telling you, but on the contrary, I have not.

There is a difference between predicting violence based on the axiom that violence begets violence, and advocating or condoning violence.

I condemn violence and have only said that Hill deserved his sentence.

However, I am warning you schmucks that though I condemn violence and civil rebellion that you must expect to see continued violence and civil rebellion because it is axiomatic that abortion violence begets further violence.

As long as legalized abortion is tolerated, there will be more violence.