Replies

Then a lot of things must "take you aback." It is a GOOD thing when a convicted murderer (Paul Hill in this case) stops breathing the same air that I do. As for the eventual eternal destination of the abortionists, that is irrelevant to a discussion of a convicted murderer being rightfully executed. If you want to see posters condemn abortion, then start an abortion thread.

And I'm sure, a lot of things take you aback. What's the point?

MY point was simply that some seem to see the evil of Paul Hill but don't correspondingly see the evil of the abortionists. And for some of us who see civil justice as an ordered extension of Divine Justice, Hill's eternal punishment is NOT "irrelevant."

Further, I think the condemnation of abortion in the context of this thread is totally appropriate and don't feel the need (thank you much!) to "start an abortion thread."

MY point was simply that some seem to see the evil of Paul Hill but don't correspondingly see the evil of the abortionists.

People are murdered every day, not just by abortionists. Again, "the evil of abortionists" is irrelevant to the disposition of a nutcase who murdered two people in cold blood and was rightfully executed by the state for his crimes.

And for some of us who see civil justice as an ordered extension of Divine Justice, Hill's eternal punishment is NOT "irrelevant."

I never said that Hill's eternal punishment was "irrelevant." On the contrary, I speculated several times that he is roasting in Hell right now.

Further, I think the condemnation of abortion in the context of this thread is totally appropriate and don't feel the need (thank you much!) to "start an abortion thread."

Simply repeating a point that I have already dispatched does not help you advance that point. It merely makes you look like a hysterical, one-issue poster who is apparently attempting to soft-pedal the actions of a murderer by using the childish argument "well, HE started it!".