you are performing a public service (so we don't have to go there), and cracking me up, at the same time. Thanks!
Thanks for posting this :)
What's pretty clear is that CBS, the legacy media generally,
and the legions of koolaid drinkers are only interested in
who authored the memos if the trail leads away from
My standard argument on why this was not a sting is below,
but at this point it hardly matters who the author is. CBS
clearly did not have any handle on the provenance of these
scraps of fiction.
McAwful: "These fake documents were White House plants.
They hoodwinked the DNC and CBS, taking advantage of our
lust for power and general gross incompetence on typography,
jargon, names, dates, places; that sort of complicated
technical stuff. It's all just so unfair."
Folks, this is what absolute utter panic looks like.
This was not a sting (by Rove, Nader or Clinton, nor
by any experienced dirty trickster).
As I've said in many threads, these docs are too clumsy to
be a sting. No clear-thinking operator could have counted
on so many key people exhibiting zero skepticism and zero
judgement, much less staying in denial until their complete
It was much more likely that the fakes would get stopped
well before exploding in Dan's face, and then turned into
an expose of a failed dirty trick (as they are now vainly
It was either a deliberate amateur forgery or someone's
gag that escaped into the wild.
The DNC/KerryKamp/CBS can play the victim card if they
like, but it is not a winning hand.
This feint does suggest that CBS either doesn't know who
the actual author is, or thinks they can conceal while
they run the RNC-trickster flag up the pole.
Who's Roger Stone? Is he a Karl Rove puppet? If so it's very, very possible. But you're not to speak of it again.
Fifth Anniversary bump for this, the very first DUmmie FUnnies!