I'd prefer an honest media, even if it were 75% liberal, to the farce of an 'impartial' media we have now.
To: .cnI redruM
Wouldn't this be "truth in advertising"?
2 posted on
11/15/2004 4:40:08 PM PST by
pipecorp
("never know where you're going till you get there." the philosopher Insectus Harem)
To: .cnI redruM
If what liberals believe, that truth is in the eye of the beholder, then no media source can be impartial. They all have to report from some point of view. So we've got a choice: Hippy news, or Conservative news radio and FOX
4 posted on
11/15/2004 4:45:17 PM PST by
conservativeimage
(Stop terrorism - same a Muslim. www.ProphetOfDoom.net)
To: .cnI redruM
If we had an objectively impartial media, we would be far better served than we are now. But the ideal is a patriotic media that understood implicitly the unique value of our nation.
5 posted on
11/15/2004 4:47:03 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(The Era of Old Media is over! Long live the Pajamasphere!)
To: .cnI redruM
They come out of school with the idea that it's their role to "make a difference" in the world. It's impossible for them to "make a difference" without being biased in one way or another.
6 posted on
11/15/2004 5:11:24 PM PST by
Jaysun
(How many votes did that HUGE A$$ Medicare bill buy us?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson