Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Udate on Kevin sites
Sue Bob's Diary ^ | 11-17-04 | Sue Bob

Posted on 11/17/2004 6:14:09 PM PST by Sue Bob

I discussed here how the MSM is making Kevin Sites its personal hero of Fallujah. WorldNetDaily.com has even more information on Sites--and it isn't pretty:

Kevin Sites, the NBC cameraman who shot video of the controversial shooting of a Fallujah insurgent by a U.S. Marine, is an anti-war activist whose photographs of Iraqi prisoners are featured on at least one anti-war website.

(Excerpt) Read more at suebobsdiary.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: kevinsites

1 posted on 11/17/2004 6:14:13 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sue Bob

He is an "anti-war activist" to the extent that other people have illegally copied his photos (violating copyright) and put them in their anti-war websites. Shame on WND.


2 posted on 11/17/2004 6:15:29 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sue Bob

I saw that! You're right, it ain't perty at all.

The real story: what we're seeing here is a major re-alignment of the free press. People are turning out or outright verbally attacking what they see as media bias, and it will hurt the Old Media far worse than they realise. We'll see who's left standing - the Old Media, the New Media, or a conglomeration of the two?


3 posted on 11/17/2004 6:17:06 PM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

If I'm not mistaken, he had to submit those photographs to "Images Against War". It's more about marketing though, than ideology...


4 posted on 11/17/2004 6:18:49 PM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

The site has two pages with his name. How do you know the site is violating copyright as opposed to Sites's contributing to it.

If you have a source for that--I'll post it.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 6:20:13 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sue Bob; dandelion
If you have a source for that--I'll post it.

Gladly. LGF/Xeni Jardin are completely trustworthy, so far as I know.

6 posted on 11/17/2004 6:34:40 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

Thanks--I updated my post with this.


7 posted on 11/17/2004 6:45:39 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

I went to LGF and read the statement by Jardin - just scanned the comments, though. One thing that stuck out at me, though. Nowhere do I see any indication that Xeni Jardin (or his (her?)attorney) has actually written the webmaster at Images Against War and demanded that they stop violating copyright. Saying that the images are being used without permission is meaningless if the copyright holder is not willing to enforce it.


8 posted on 11/17/2004 6:58:42 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (It's not evidence of wrongdoing just because Democrats don't like the outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

Another weird aspect is that on the Images Against War website there is a copyright disclaimer emphasizing that the images belong to the photographers and cannot be copied.
http://www.imagesagainstwar.com/imprint.php


9 posted on 11/17/2004 7:04:00 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sue Bob

Are the Sites' images still posted over there? "Xeni Jardin" wrote that LGF comment several hours ago. If the images are still up, then either Images Against War hasn't been ordered to cease and desist, or they have been and are simply ignoring the order.


10 posted on 11/17/2004 7:10:22 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (It's not evidence of wrongdoing just because Democrats don't like the outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

Yes, they are:
http://www.imagesagainstwar.com/index.php?display=521
http://www.imagesagainstwar.com/index.php?display=522


11 posted on 11/17/2004 7:14:42 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

Thank you for the update. I had been to LGF earlier and Xeni's letter had not been posted yet.

In all truth, you get your money/exposure where you can when you freelance, so it's not uncommon to submit to all kinds of sites. Publicity is publicity - however, the "Images against War" site gallery makes it sound like these are submissions, as opposed to postings since they call it a "gallery"...


12 posted on 11/17/2004 8:03:26 PM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

Thank you for the update. I had been to LGF earlier and Xeni's letter had not been posted yet.

In all truth, you get your money/exposure where you can when you freelance, so it's not uncommon to submit to all kinds of sites. Publicity is publicity - however, the "Images against War" site gallery makes it sound like these are submissions, as opposed to postings since they call it a "gallery"...


13 posted on 11/17/2004 8:03:26 PM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson