This is great diversion if you have a few minutes to spend studing how the paranoia of some (i.e., liberals) deals with the new strength of bloggers and Internet technology disseminating the news.
I think it shows how much they fear the automation of news and believe it will corrput it, like it's not corrupted already. What would the news be like without a liberal spin?
I welcome this new concept of newsgathering, even though it is fictional. What are your thoughts?
To: ChewyGasMan
2 posted on
12/06/2004 4:04:38 PM PST by
spodefly
(I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
To: ChewyGasMan
3 posted on
12/06/2004 4:15:39 PM PST by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: Egon; Eb Wilson; Orgiveme
Bump for later. Interesting presentation style.
4 posted on
12/06/2004 4:19:51 PM PST by
RhoTheta
(Democrats are the coalition of the coerced and the bribed!)
To: ChewyGasMan
I got bored at 2007 and bailed out. Took too long to develop. And anyway, he lost me with the Google Grid. It didn't make any sense. It did make me want to check out Tivo, though.
5 posted on
12/06/2004 4:23:17 PM PST by
Huck
(The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
To: ChewyGasMan
So, their main concern is that the NY Times will go belly-up, and with it, all vestiges of "journalistic ethics"?...All I can say is, 2014 can't get here soon enough.
7 posted on
12/06/2004 4:32:51 PM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: ChewyGasMan
I had a weird reaction to the presentation. But I don't think it was the one that the presentation was intending it to be. Instead of scaring me, I was excited about the progress of information technology and the extincts of NYT.
8 posted on
12/06/2004 4:41:33 PM PST by
bewitched
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson