As opposed to being backed up by multiple sources?
My site was the first to announce that Dan Rather was leaving. I posted it two days before he announced. Everyone on FreeRepublic accused me then of trying to get a few free hits, and then the day he announced...no apologies whatsoever...
And Debka states the obvious as news from time to time as proof of their more outlandish claims. You want cred here? Start naming sources.
I actually dont care what you think of me dirtboy. I came here stating the facts.
Anyone with a dog's intelligence is smart enough to know Dan Rather announced his retirement at that time because he knew he was about to be forced out. If this hadnt happened we all know Dan would still be going...Come on now...
Maybe im NOT at liberty to say exactly who told me this since it is a CBS affiliate.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1285605/posts
As opposed to being backed up by multiple sources?
I just looked over some of your posts. Maybe you need to criticize yourself some. You post articles without backing it up with "multiple" sources.
All my items on my site are backed up, unless i get a scoop from a news source. Seems you dont have a problem with Matt Drudge posting his scoops without naming an exact source do you?
As far as being laid off? No, never been laid off. I go to school fulltime and work fulltime buddy.