Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
I understand what you're saying, and I agree it would make things a heck of a lot easier on everyone.

But why would I write down some comment my friend made to me about some medical show we're watching? Who does that? Especially the post office thing. (But isn't hindsight great? It makes us look so smart and organized.)

And what about this: In January, 1989, Michael writes down that Terri (with a $10 million life insurance policy) would wish to die. In April, 1989, Scott writes down the same. In June, so does Joan.

In January of 1990, Terri becomes brain damaged, cause unknown.

Since it's in writing though, you're comfortable with "pulling the plug" and authorizing the $10 mil, huh?

Excuse me, but you'd be screaming to high heaven. Worse than you are now!

56 posted on 04/03/2005 9:03:31 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
But why would I write down some comment my friend made to me about some medical show we're watching? Who does that? Especially the post office thing. (But isn't hindsight great? It makes us look so smart and organized.)

You wouldn't, because if your friend wanted to make an advance directive, your friend would do so in writing or some other tangible medium. If your friend fails to do so, that would suggest your friend wasn't all that serious about his wishes. If you thought your friend was serious about his wishes, you should get some paper and ask him to write them down.

And what about this: In January, 1989, Michael writes down that Terri (with a $10 million life insurance policy) would wish to die. In April, 1989, Scott writes down the same. In June, so does Joan. In January of 1990, Terri becomes brain damaged, cause unknown.

If those things had happened and Terri became incapacitated as a consequence of some event the Schiavos could not plausibly have foreseen or caused (e.g. a train wreck), the fact that the statements were written down as they were would make them more believable. Had the statements been so written in the extant case, it would have justified more investigation into the cause of the supposed "collapse".

To put it another way: it would be plausible for the Schiavos to conspire if they'd expect to have something to gain by it. For them to note for themselves Terri's supposed wishes would seem strange but if they had no way of knowing she'd be incapacitated the most logical explanation would be that Terri in fact said the things claimed. If Terri's incapacitation was something the Schiavos could have foreseen or caused, then conspiracy becomes more plausible.

60 posted on 04/03/2005 9:25:02 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson