Sorry, I dispute some of the figures in your post above, but I am not going to get into an argument with a freaking website, from which you seem to cut and paste all your posts. Nor am I going to respond to a cut and pasted reply.
I have seen AIDS. I have seen the labs from the patients. They are clearly abnormal.
I have no idea why you think political conservatives are a fertile field for this fringe lunacy, but I suggest that it belongs more on Rense.com, or have you tried Art Bell?
The current crop of antiretrovirals are eliminating all but the most physiologically buried of the retrovirus, allowing most infected with the garden variety HIV to live extended healthy lives AS LONG AS THEY CONTINUE THE ANTIRETROVIRALS. Some will even have such a low viral count that they test negative for HIV. But if and when they discontinue the antiretroviral therapy, the bug returns and again does its work of destroying the immune system.
There are a couple of new strains of HIV that are resistent to the antiretrovirals and which are much more aggressive in destroying the immune system of those infected. They die a LOT sooner.
I don't doubt that your AIDS patients are "abnormal." Both sides of the debate agree with your observation. The question is what is causing their disease. I challenge you to read the scientific paper linked to my last post in order to at least understand what you are arguing against. As for cutting and pasting, why should I rewrite that the experts on my side have already said, and better than me? Wouldn't it be a shame if your AIDS patients are really dying of something else besides complications/diseases brought on by HIV infection???