[Judith Anne]

You are spamming FR with your efforts to promote the Duesen Agenda here on a CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL WEBSITE.

In my opinion, you are USING FR to get a wider constituency for discredited, unscientific and dangerous theories of an HIV nutcase.

No one reads, listens to, or has any truck with these clearly crackpot paranoid fantasies, so you came here. I consider that lower than low.

How many of these posts have you made in the last week? Why? What is your personal agenda? What are your conservative bona fides?

You have no reason to think that you will receive any kind of warm welcome from those of us who were on the front lines of HIV treatment. You are wasting the entire forum's time, and I intend to post on every single thread you start from now on with my arguments that you should be banned. You aren't dealing with any kind of interesting speculation, you are dishing out dogma--and you are as dogmatic as the scientific establishment you claim to decry.

And Duesen has done NOTHING for any sufferer of HIV. Period.

Can you name a cure? Can you name a treatment? Can you name one single person or point to any peer-reviewed literature that gives a Duesen-treated recovery case history?

No.

[TapTheSource]

If you bothered reading the links I posted in #2 you would realize that it was the CONSEVATIVE MOVEMENT that picked up on these ideas FIRST. Ever heard of Policy Review, National Review, American Spectator, World, Reason Magazine??? All of these publications published articles promoting Duesberg. This is THE CONSERVATIVE public health issue of the new millennium. If you wish to bury you head in the sand, that is your business. My agenda re: AIDS is the same agenda as all my other CONSERVATIVE issues...the TRUTH. Is this how you treat all FReepers who form ping lists and consistantly post issues that are close to their heart? You're the one who came to this thread, not the other way around. If you can't handle people who expose on environmentalism, the Public Health Movement, Socialized Medicine, Population Control and the like, then don't bother reading my threads. And it was you, I might add, who decided to treat your fellow FReepers with disrespect with your whole "this is BS", these guys are "crackpots" mumbo jumbo. If you can't handle the heat that you yourself generate, then perhaps you should refrain from discussions that go over your head or otherwise offend your delicate sensibilities.

[John Valentine]

I just read your post 72 and I now realize that you are from the "dark side", with no intention of trying to come to grips with the facts.

I doubt very much you have ever read any honest researech from the non-orthodox researchers like Duesberg, but are simply reacting like a trained parrot. But You are NOT a parrot.

Start thinking for yourself! My challenge stands. Read Duesberg's book. If you have the guts to chance finding out how you have been participating in bad medicine.

And it just doesn't do calling Dr. Duesberg a nutcase. That has been the best the entire medical establishment ahs been able to come up with agsint his ideas in two decades. It's pitiful.

And yes, this is a conservative website. And I hope that as a Conservative you would object to pouring billions of dollars down the biggest medical rathole in history.

[John Valentine]

Can you name one single person or point to any peer-reviewed literature that gives a Duesen-treated recovery case history?

YEs

Read "Inventing the AIDS Virus". If you dare.