You told me and Nonlinear you were going to furnish us the code so we could form an opinion. No, she asked what we thought should be incuded in her report. She has said the report should be done this month.
Why not give her the time to finish the report and get it vetted instead of demanding she jump on your command? When I read her when she first came here I understood she was talking about what facts to include in her report, not that she was going to drop everything and report directly to you.
SD
Who the hell are you? And why, if you are this passionate about defending a proven left winger, haven't you voiced your opinion before.
If you have followed this at all, Bev volunteered the info and then disappeared. I am not asking her to "jump" to my demands, she OFFERED it. Do you understand? I would like to think no one here jumps to conclusions before they know what the HELL they are talking about.
Perhaps you should research this before you accuse me of not having an open mind about it.
I really take offense to you accusing me of being anything other than trying to get to the facts of this case. Unless you know something I don't, I will thank you to research the facts before you accuse me of something I did not do!
I must have missed the part where she gave any kind of a time frame. Also she has left several questions unanswered.. I suppose that's OK with you. Personally, I don't trust her any farther than the DUmmies do.
I have been in touch with various 'puter people who have direct involvement in this case and am waiting for you and your obvious pier to back up these allegations with some cold hard facts.
Unless you have something constructive to add to this I would appreciate it if you would leave me the hell alone. I got into this because of my knowledge of machine language, nothing else. If you follow this back to its source, you will find my interest is in whether or not this can be done from a purely scientific point of view. Screw politics. I want to see the mechanics of it.
I could care less about yours or Bev's political aspirations. I was merely looking into whether or not what she was alleging is possible. It's not like she is some kind of contributing member of FR. She disagrees with our whole political philosophy. For you to be siding with the left astounds me. You have been here for years. Is it your opinion Bev Harris and her organization is trying to forward conservative views? If you believe that perhaps you should look to the organizations she is supporting and what organizations are supporting her. I am NOT going to give her a free ride. She is going to have to actually prove something to me and most of the people I associate with here at FR.