Replies

Whoa there big fella! That's a lot of teeth you're baring there Allosaur but I'm sorry to say it's for naught.

Bev's reports, whether it's on Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Washington State or wherever will be vague enough to justify further funding requests from fools with money. (Sorry, Bev, just saying it they way it is) Trying to pin her down to party affiliation and such is pointless since it matters so little. Like your reptile brethren the Chameleon, she will change color to suit her needs. You are making the mistake that somehow truth or justice will emerge from all this analysis.

As for analyzing two counties in WA, that's enough! The difference was only 129 votes and King County alone should be scrutinized to the hilt. No surprise that they would stonewall Bev or anybody else that came sniffing around. They are GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!!!

The problems with the ballots in WA are the same with the butterfly ballots in Florida in 2000. If you punched a single butterfly ballot, you would not get a hanging or pregnant chad. However, if you try to punch a hole through 20 or more at once, you will likely get pregnant chads at the bottom of the stack. Bev should be investigating the DemocRAT operative that had one of the voting stands on him. Maybe she is but I can't be bothered to check.

I'm content to let Rossi's attorneys fight it out in WA without BBV's assistance.

Allosaur, don't waste your time investigating Bev. She covers her tracks much better than Andy. Go give the horses a brushing, they'll appreciate it and it will be therapeutic for you!

PS: When is www.Scamdy.com coming back on line?

Allosaur, don't waste your time investigating Bev

I appreciate your input. It appears to me, all of sudden I have to defend myself. I have never been interested in anything but the computer code of this allegation. Soothing Dave somehow thinks I am not giving Bev the opportunity he thinks she deserves. She offered. I and another FReeper accepted the opportunity to look at the code and haven't heard anything since. Now she is trying to make it look like I am making her beholding to me. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Kinda got my dander up when I was accused of not giving Bev the benefit of the doubt. She invited Me and Nonlinear, we merely asked questions regarding her so called "proof'. Since then we have heard absolutely nothing. Then all of sudden we're pickin on her. That is not the case. All I was doing was replying to an inquiry from another FReeper who wanted to know the latest. There is no latest, we haven't heard a word from her camp. Today is the first time she has bothered to address this since the initial inquiry. All of sudden I'm told she said a month. That is not what I understood to be the case. I thought she was going to let me "look' at the "code". I would assume this would have happened prior to her making some kind of report.