Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon

Maybe you should take a deep-breath! The only lies we are talking about here would be those told and drawn by Mr. Haeckel, years ago, perpetuated by people like you and your atheist buddies. I'm sorry if the truth hurts. Why don't you cut and paste another 50+ paragraph post from talkorg or the P-thumb and calm down.


143 posted on 07/06/2005 10:54:44 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


For the lurkers:

Online Articles of Notable Interest

144 posted on 07/06/2005 10:56:51 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo; Stultis
Maybe you should take a deep-breath!

Maybe you should get to the point.

The only lies we are talking about here would be those told and drawn by Mr. Haeckel, years ago,

Are you really this incapable of following the discussion? "We" were talking about *creationist* behavior on this thread *long* you showed up. Did it escape your attention that this thread *started* with a satirical cartoon about the behavior of creationists?

Maybe the "only" lies *you* want to talk about are those of Haeckel, but "we" have already been discussing creationist dishonesty for a long time now. But I can understand why you'd want to keep restricting the conversation to only Haeckel, since even though you have to go back to the 19th century to get a juicy example of a biologist being significantly misleading, there are *THOUSANDS* of CONTEMPORARY examples of creationists lying their faces off.

Deal with it.

Or don't. But don't kid yourself -- your running away from that topic doesn't make it go away, nor convince anyone that creationists are actually accurate, honest, and willing to address sticky issues head-on. Quite the contrary, in fact.

perpetuated by people like you and your atheist buddies.

Uh huh. Please present your evidence for your presumption that I am an "atheist". This should be pretty funny. Then you can repeat the exercise for my "buddies", as you call them.

And what exactly are "people like me"? I'm not a recapitulationist. Be specific.

I'm sorry if the truth hurts.

I'm sorry if you keep revealing that you have barely a passing acquaintance with truth, and instead keep posting your wild guesses and prejudices as if they were facts.

And your laughable snipes don't hurt at all.

Why don't you cut and paste another 50+ paragraph post from talkorg or the P-thumb and calm down.

Why don't you try to actually address the evidence which I presented and the points I made?

Oh, right, you can't. You don't actually know enough about biology to do that. You never bothered, despite my repeated suggestions over the past year or so imploring you to do so. Not that this lack of knowledge stops you from being a belligerent anklebiter on these threads, though, because hey, you've glanced at a few creationist websites and that's *ALL* you need to know about the subject, right?

Arrogant snottiness is no substitute for knowledge, son.

166 posted on 07/06/2005 12:42:11 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson