Replies

To: balrog666

Not really, as history supports much of the bible. Your username is even childishly provocative.

22 posted on 07/05/2005 7:34:34 PM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)

To: RightthinkinAmerican

Oh, and there's the little "missing link" problem for you to explain.

24 posted on 07/05/2005 7:37:12 PM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)

To: RightthinkinAmerican

Not really, as history supports much of the bible. Your username is even childishly provocative.

History supports much of most novels, so what?

And your user name isn't? Get a life.

25 posted on 07/05/2005 7:37:49 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)

To: RightthinkinAmerican

Not really, as history supports much of the bible.

History supports much of "Gone With the Wind", too.

Are you alleging that this is therefore sufficient evidence for the complete validity of *every* portion of these books?

And what about the parts which history, geology, physics, etc. actually contradict?

47 posted on 07/05/2005 9:33:01 PM PDT by Ichneumon

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794