Posted on 09/29/2005 9:56:35 PM PDT by fire_eye
Can't find a URL (title in the spewspaper was "Dancing in the Dark at the White House) but the leftist harpy blithered as follows in its (pitiful excuse for a) column today and, sensing blood in the water, I'm willing to type it in:
"Karen Hughes, the Bush nanny who knows nothing about the Muslim world and yet is charged with selling the U.S. to it... (flew) to Saudi Arabia to tell women in black abayas how much she likes driving even though they can't.
...she looked taken aback when some Saudi women told her that just becaus they could not vote or drive did not mean that they felt they were treated unfairly.
...They feel the administration and the American media have emphasized the repression of Saudi women post-9/11 as a way to demonize Saudi Arabia and paint Saudi men as bullies and terrorists."
Hey - Whoreen - Go look up "Casuistry" in the dictionary. You've just set a whole new satandard for it. (And by the way, you leftist schumerhole - did you ever stop to think what would have happened to those "Saudi women" if they had told Karen Hughes anything other than what their owners, oops excuse me husbands, told them to say, you filthy, rotten... oh, never mind.)
Thanks for advancing the cause of women's rights, Whoreen. I bet you'd personally sell every one of those "Saudi women" into prostitution if it would get George Bush out of office. Your leftist "situational ethics" is showing... Bitch.
THANK you... I was just grumbling over not having stashed an appropriate picture for the occasion.
So why should we be upset when Muslim women are stoned? They are such hypocrites.
It's shocking that M. Douglas would dump MoDo for that shrew!
;-)
Welsh women are alright.
:-)
Try growing up in a harem and see how YOU turn out.
(Of curse, there are probably worse fates, such as growing up to be Whoreen...)
No kidding...what in the world was Michael Douglas thinking??? < /sarcasm>
You can read it here:
http://fbihop.blogspot.com/2005/09/dancing-in-dark.html
Though why anyone would want to, I don't know.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Posting pictures of scantily-clad beautiful women is "Sexploitation", in Whoreen's cosmology. (Locking them up in harems and mutilating their genitals, however, is to be defended in the name of "Multiculturalism", of course - particularly if it's an evil conservative who's criticizing the practice...)
Liberal trolls will want to read it so they can accuse me of quoting Whoreen out of context.
Dowd deserves to be quoted out of context - its her MO.
Thank God the NYT's put that shrew behind a $50-pay-to-read wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.