Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

The idea came from a friend. His original suggestion was that the it be based on the number of adults living in the state - a poll tax. E.g. $10,000 per adult. That would effectively eliminate any possibility of evasion. I objected because it is regressive - poor states would pay a higher percentage of GDP than wealthier states.


4 posted on 10/14/2005 11:41:50 AM PDT by Jibaholic (The facts of life are conservative - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jibaholic

But the "poll" tax is the constitutional option.

I.2.iii:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.


5 posted on 10/15/2005 9:44:04 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson