Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
One difference is that Nixon was actually guilty of some things. (Probably nothing worse than what Kennedy and Johnson had gotten away with, and trivial compared to some of Clinton's offenses, but still against the law.) President Bush hasn't done anything wrong, as far as any of us know...the Democrats are trying to criminalize policy differences.

One other difference between Nixon and Bush is that Nixon fought back against his enemies. Maybe today is a sign that Bush will finally start to refute the accusations thrown at him.

16 posted on 11/11/2005 8:24:42 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

Geeeeez! You don't even know what Nixon was or wasn't guilty of and yet you're out here saying he was actually guilty of some things.

He was .. but you should know what they are. Nixon was guilty of covering up the break-in. Nixon didn't plan it, and he didn't know his people were planning it. I don't think he would have approved of it .. but when he found out what they had done .. he chose to hide it.

It was a very big mistake. He should have exposed them and fired their butts!


20 posted on 11/11/2005 11:59:36 PM PST by CyberAnt ( I believe in Congressman Curt Weldon re Able Danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson