(Vanity) Folding@Home FReepers - A Tribute to Ronald Reagan

self ^ | 01/08/2005 | self

[Klutz Dohanger]

Interesting math...

We're averaging about 70 points per CPU per day, they're averaging about 40 points per CPU per day.

Yugo's vs Ford F-150's perhaps?

[DocRock]

Sweeeeeeeeeet! Bookmark

[papasmurf]

Yeah, that's what keeps me laughing so hard all day...

Relative, huh? . . . Our top contributor alone (YOU) has more points and wu's than their whole team.

Our top contributor alone (YOU) is out "folding" their whole team.

Our top 2&3 contributors have more points and wu's than their whole team.

Our top 2&3 contributors are out "folding" their whole team.

...and the "relative" list goes on.

THESE are the "relative" stats that count...

US...



and THEM...





:O)

P

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Klutz Dohanger]

WhooHoo. I'm at 99. I probably won't be there but a few minutes. But, I'm there now.

Yeah, but that would put you in the top 20, on that *other* team... :)

[Klutz Dohanger]

You're no slouch either. You'd be a rock solid #2 man, and moving up the charts if you were over on the dark side... :)

Hell... the get-loaded contingent alone, would give them a run for their money.

I check their thread about 2-3 times a day, to see what's up over there, and it never fails to leave me chuckling...

We all know that it's ultimately for the science, but when one of our erstwhile opponents points out our relative positions, the keywords are "That doesn't matter, it's for a good cause"... but I can just imagine the scowls and frowns, as they try to figure out why they're not ahead of us...

*sigh* *sniff* *sob* *Freepers are ahead of us... *

Like you said... eloquently, and to the point....

Bawahahahahahahahaha....

[papasmurf]

Haha, Ken-in_Texas has more than we do put together. lol

But, all things considered, they are doing very well.

:O)

P

[Sunshine55]

I know this has probably been answered before, but how do I recover a job that was almost complete? I had to reboot and lost everything.

[processing please hold]

>Yeah, but that would put you in the top 20, on that *other* team... :)

I'd rather be the last on this team, than 20 on theirs. :-)

[Klutz Dohanger]

The client should have picked up from the last checkpoint, which means if you didn't change any of the setting, the most you lost was 15-60 minutes worth of work.

Which version of the client are you using. The GUI based, or the console?

In either case, find the folder in which the program is running, and then look for a file called fahlog.txt.

Copy and past the last 30 or so lines here, and we can look and see what has happened, or is happening.

[Klutz Dohanger]

I'd rather be the last on this team, than 20 on theirs. :-)

..... :-)

[Klutz Dohanger]

Also, with the GUI client, it sometimes takes a bit for it to recover from a hard crash.

The .txt file I referenced, will show you this. The program needs to check the fah_xxcore.exe files, verify that the data up to the checkpoint is still ok, check in with Mama, to make sure that it still wants the job processed, then does some other "behind the scenes" twists and turns, before it resumes.

I've seen this take up to 30 minutes before. If all else fails, and it looks like the client hasn't resumed, manually stop it, and restart. Sometimes that will do the trick.

[papasmurf]

Great answer!

:O)


P

[Sunshine55]

Thanks. I am back up to 30/3000 already so I think that is what's happening.

[processing please hold]

;-)

[processing please hold]

Thanks. :-)

[Klutz Dohanger]

DUfunnies...

#170. Check your Task Manager. If it's not there, it's not running. If it's not, then instead of rebooting, power off and power back on.

Huh?? **scraching head**

[Klutz Dohanger]

DUfunnies

Caoimhe #168. aww let them They are just nasty people anyway. Mean people suck. Freepers suck worse.

[Sunshine55]

Which version of the client are you using. The GUI based, or the console?

I have no clue :o(

[processing please hold]

If you say 'Huh' - imagine how inadequate I feel trying to figure that statement out.

[oblomov]

Since they are DUers, they must be bonobos.