Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2006 11:58:14 AM PST by cchandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cchandler
Speaking of "anonymous sources" and how they are treated by the NYTimes... get a load of this:

These are two quotes from the same article in the NYT regarding the leadup to the Alito hearings:

First we read that “two of Judge Alito’s supporters who participated in the murder boards, speaking about the confidential sessions on condition of anonymity for fear of White House reprisals...”

Farther down the page we read of “two Democratic aides briefed on his meeting with Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York... The aides, speaking anonymously because the meeting was private... ”

Reprisals, by the way, is a loaded word in the Times lexicon. Here are some of the other parties meting out reprisals in the paper’s news columns over the course of the last month: the Communist Chinese government, Iraqi insurgents, New Jersey gang members, French police, and the Islamist murderer of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh. In so many words, then, the Republicans are thugs, the Democrats gentlemen. Nice.

2 posted on 01/19/2006 2:31:38 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson