Skip to comments.CNN Perplexed by Calm U.S. Public
Posted on 03/20/2006 12:02:47 PM PST by freemarket_kenshepherd
click here to read article
I'm not one bit afraid of facts. I just do not rely on one source. I am well acquainted with Neilsen. I was a Neilsen household until last June when I moved out of CA.
If I had a Neilson box, I'd watch nothing but South Park and NCIS marathons.
Dear God. I'm happy you're disqualified! LOL
I think if you backed out all of the CNN feeds at every airport in the country they would actually be below FNC.
Not to mention that as stated, FNC retains it's viewers 4 times as long. Whoever's turning on CNN clearly can't stand it for very long.
The "Airport Channel" is insignificant anyway, since it's target audience are people sitting around at airports the channel is carried in. I've seen that channel at the airport in Minneapolis, and it's nothing more than snippets of CNN and Headline News.
Largely because CNN is wholly unwatchable beyond a 15-minute cume period.
If I wanted to hear a drunken old bastard spouting off a bunch of psychobabble, I'd go to the local watering hole.
Here are the facts. Kind of obvious you work in TV News since not a single thing in your post was accurate. Check link for Viewership numbers. Don't be afraid of the facts "journalist".
Try reading for content in the future. Don't be afraid of reality. CNN is boasting in your link their viewer ship is UP 55% in Feb. for Lou Dobbs. Based on Neilsion the top6 most watched Cable News Shows are on Fox with over 1 Mill or more viewers. Larry King, CNNS most watch show only barely cracks 900,000 nightly. There is NOTHING in your link posting of absolute numbers for CNN. You are completely misstating what the CNN Press Release claims. It claims they are GAINING numbers NOT that they have more viewers. What your link takes one to is merely a regurigiation of a Press Release by CNN. Since the top 5 most watched Cable shows are all on Fox, CNN has FEWER viewers despite "Gaining 55%" in Febuary. Typical meaningless Advertising language. Try actually reading for reality not just regurgitating what you want to belive
CNN: Who's there?
CNN: The Public Who?
The Public who is laughing our asses off that it is finally universally known that your sorry network is finally irrelevant and that you are "perplexed" as to why (LOL)!
Angry much? You should work on that. Anyways, I was clear in my original post that the numbers were for total audience (I didnt use the link for the CNN blather, I used it for the Nielson total audience cume at the bottom of the page). More people tune into CNN over the course of the day, month and year. The difference is that Fox viewers watch longer, and tune in more often, so Fox ends up with a lot of audience duplication, a lot of people watching multiple hours, multiple shows, etc.
Here's a really crude, non-representative (over)simplification. Lets say 100 people are watching Fox at the start of the day, and 50 people are watching CNN at the start of the day. They watch for the whole hour. However, at the start of each new hour, Fox only loses 10 viewers (to be replaced by 10 new viewers), and CNN loses 20 viewers (to be replaced by 20 new viewers). By the end of the 7th hour, CNN actually eclipses Fox in total number of people who have tuned in, even though Fox has doubled CNN in viewership in each individual hour.
And thats how this works.
My head hurts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.