WRONG.
Your response was condescending, therefor this may have a similar tone.
A Straw Man is the fallacy of attacking a position that is not the opponents position, while you claim it is his position. Your argument does not address my position. Perhaps I shall attempt to make my position more obvious in the future.
A straw Man is NOT a weak point in an argument as you claim. You are wrong, period.
Your claim in post 9 is flawed because of obviously false premises, a fact you seem unable to grasp.
Since you claim my argument is weak, I would like to point out that your response in post 14 is fallacious and self defeating. Go for it, defend your position on where one ought to spend resources. I dare you. Be warned, the "fiction" cliche will not suffice to justify your incoherent apologetic.
A straw man argument is nitpicking one minor, or weaker, portion of one's overall argument, ignoring the rest. If you need further educationing, be sure to let me know.
I just finished reading the Da Vinci Code last night, by the way. You and your ilk are wasting an extraordinary amounmt of time and energy over a rather pulpy piece of tripe. It is obvious and plain fiction, which is quite evident by centering the whole thing around the completely debunked Priory of Scion nonsense.