sorry, but I'm on the other side of yours.
net neutrality means the isps must treat all megabytes the same.
without net neutrality, soros could pay the isps to put FR in the slow lane or mellon scaif could pay to put DU in the slow lane
this serves no one. treat all megabytes the same please.
I have a question for you concerning your fear:
Why is it that his hasn't happened so far?
There is nothing in place now to prevent the abuses that you mention; in fact, it would have been much easier at different times over the last decade for manipulations like that to have taken place.
So far it hasn't happened - why not?
I am not sure what this is about, but if MoveOn.org is on one side, I am on the other. That much is common sense to me.
Wrong Answer!
This is about preventing federal regulation of the internet. Who would you rather have making decisions on bandwith: the companies competing in a free market, or the federal government.
(Jeopardy Theme)
Here is The Wall Street Journal on the issue:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008391
Yes, or the alternative media will go away.