Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee
Maybe all this recent partisanship, the discontiguous information streams, etc. will be good for America. Maybe we can finally get away from this absurd notion that objectivity is possible, or that the meanstream flow of information is somehow "clean" and free of bias. Maybe we can retreat to our corners for a while, and then everyone can look for the truth in each side's information stream. I think I know which side would win that fight.

I am thinking I would like to update the article with some of the information provided by others, including the FR folks herein. Any objection if I include some small portions of what you provided in your long reply post above?
19 posted on 06/07/2006 7:48:41 AM PDT by connell (Christopher from ModernConservative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: connell

You should be able to provide examples without needing to quote FReepers. And If you read through some of those linked threads (some are Snopes links and some are FR threads about Snopes links), you will find even more examples (just follow the rabbit down the hole).

The more you can do to quote Snopes' own statements, rather than a FReeper's interpetation of their statements, the more people will agree with what you present as evidence of Snopes' bias.

I only learned about their take on the buses today (when searching for some examples). There was an FR thread. You might try searching threads for headlines with the word Snopes or keyword Snopes.


20 posted on 06/07/2006 8:36:19 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson