So, in your estimation it must be okay to teach sexuality (of any kind) in kindergarten. It's obvious you don't have kids or you'd see the flaws in this tactic, because as I wrote, schools need permission to teach sex-ed to teens.
But teaching sexuality to six-year-olds is okay with you, and any parent who protests is wrong? At least he has values. Where are yours...?
"But teaching sexuality to six-year-olds is okay with you, and any parent who protests is wrong? At least he has values. Where are yours...?"
Ummm... Did you even READ my message? My message had NOTHING to do with homosexuality, or with teaching sexuality to kids. My message had to do with the specific facts of this school fighting case, and the catch-22 that the superintendent is in when it comes to the investigation of it. He's been assailed by folks for not investigating thoroughly, and then for investigating thoroughly.
Methinks that you have a one-track mind.
k.."And this author, having read up on the topic, should be ashamed of himself for perpetuating it"
A pathological liar once said to me: I never lie. I'm always trying to tell the truth; it's just that I'm never allowed to."
Your reasonng is as upside-down and twisted as is the pathological liars. Do you know why? Because both of you have a self-centered interest in (1) deceiving yourselves, and (2) deceiving everyone else.
Your protestations on behalf of the superintendant ring hollow while your lack of outrage on behalf of the little boy is absolutely contemptible. Its underlying message says: He deserved what he got, and so did his father.
And you dared to shame the author of the story?