Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

I thought Constitutional amendments had to be ratified by the states. In any case I agree with your assessment. I too think the Feds have WAY too much power, especially in Law Enforcement and Education. Oh, and now Commerce. Thanks for the enlightenment.


55 posted on 08/14/2006 5:01:36 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: phoenix0468
I thought Constitutional amendments had to be ratified by the states. In any case I agree with your assessment. I too think the Feds have WAY too much power, especially in Law Enforcement and Education. Oh, and now Commerce. Thanks for the enlightenment.

You're welcome. And yes, a Constitutional amemdment does have to be ratified by the States.

The States created the federal government, and transferred to it a limited set of powers in order for it to accomplish specific objectives. Those powers were fixed at the time the Constitution was ratified, as they were understood and intended by those who wrote and ratified the empowering document. They can only be legitimately modified by the States, since they are the source of the original grant of power and all powers not transferred remain with the States.

56 posted on 08/14/2006 6:45:52 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson