Harris, Nelson will debate

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060907/BLOG01/60907018/-1/RSS ^ | 7 September 2006

[NautiNurse]

Grab a cup of coffee and look at this research about former Harris staffer Glenn Hodas and how effective he's been for conservative candidates. He can't find a reporter he doesn't like when he takes every opportunity to trash his former boss, just like you are doing. Not only that, but a whole lot of conservative candidates he works with lose big time. Glenn Hodas" GOP Friend or Foe?.

Trashing a former employer is a personality disorder that signals No Hire to me during an interview.

Chris Ingram, another former staffer, has none other than Al Franken as his #1 testimonial on his website. Ingram is a regular fixture on Air America. Ingram has a photo of himself and Al Franken holding an ear of corn together on his testimonial webpage. How odd is that?

[Rockingham]

What, specifically, do you want proof of? I sent references to news articles that cover most of what I have stated against her, what more, specifically do you want?

[Rockingham]

So why did Harris hire Hodas, with so much material against him readily available? Did she ask for a resume, run an Internet search, and then hire Hodas in the belief that he would help her draw Democrats and Independents? Or did she hire him blindly -- and complain later?

By the way, the articles I referred to did not primarily rely on Hodas, if at all.

[NautiNurse]

Not one time have you provided evidence of your allegation that Harris lied.

[Rockingham]

I recall reading that Harris lied to a staffer about the grand jury subpoena until he confronted her with the bills to the campaign for legal work relating to it. I do not have the article at hand, and the apparent references to it in Google are to articles no longer available.

I have to ask this: do you regard Harris' conduct in regard to the grand jury subpoena as acceptable, that she at least hid it from the staff, the public, and from the US House when House rules required its disclosure on the record?

[NautiNurse]

You are maliciously calling Katherine Harris a liar, yet you admit you don't have a shred of evidence to back up your serious allegation.

Take your scurrilous Harris smear campaign to some liberal forum where your B.S. will be welcome as fact.

[Rockingham]

Get a grip. I'll find the article, and then force feed it to you, pixel by pixel.

In the meantime, do you offer any defense of Harris' failure to inform the US House of her grand jury subpoena, as House rules require?