Wal-Mart Contributes 5% Of Online Sales To Homosexual Group

AFA action site ^

[Fierce Allegiance]

I will continue to support Walmart will all of my Christmas shopping on-line.

While it's not my intention to support Wal Mart, necesarily, the $4 they got from this won't stop me from shopping there.

[Gopher Broke]

I respect Walmart for their past support of families on various issues...but they need to keep away from support of the radical, homosexual agenda.

I will tell them when they do right...and when they do wrong!

[ThreeYearLurker]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1735743/posts

Duplicate post, please delete

[Tulsa Ramjet]

Any donations for heterosexual marriages? With all the special categories, I heard that's a dying breed.

[Tulsa Ramjet]

WalMart SuperSinner, 24hr Bath house
Low Prices for Every Gay!

[newzjunkey]

How is this different from any referral/affiliate setup? I see site all the time which get a cut of book sales made via links from their site.

This is only for a DC group's benefit and only if you go to their site. Solution? Don't patronize the gay group's site.

[FR_addict]

This is just one of the things WalMart is doing to further the homosexual agenda. I think the fact that they are a sponsor of the Out & Equal Summit is a much bigger issue.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1738729/posts

If you look on page 3
http://www.outandequal.org/summit/2006/documents/2006SummitGuide_web_000.pdf

WalMart is listed as a PLENARY SPONSOR. This is evidently higher that a Platinum, Gold, Bronze, and Friend Sponsor.

[FR_addict]

WalMart has to approve the link to their website. I'm sure there are conservative groups that have asked WalMart to have a link and a five percent commission on each sale. Why did they choose to approve this particular homosexual activist group?

As you say, it's probably not much different than other setups, but WalMart was a holdout to the homosexual pressure groups, now they've caved under pressure from the activists.

[the OlLine Rebel]

This is at least the 3rd thread on this topic, and I last argued on it several days ago.

Thanks, but just FYI.